Spring Creek Association 

Call Us:  +1.775.753.6295

Frontier Communications Issues

Geese Management


The PUCN Commission had their final hearing yesturday regarding the water meter issues we are facing in Spring Creek. The PUCN staff and BCP really put in the time to understand the issues and express their continued concerns to the Commission that there is likely more customers effected in this case, as well as pointed out there are really no strong programs for staff training and policies and procedures in place as well as the lack of customer service and satisfaction in our area. 

The next steps are Commissioner Pongracz will write a draft order.  In the last section, there will be Commission Discussion & Findings and then it will say “it is ordered that..” &  that’s where you’ll want to look for the outcome.  Then the Draft Order will go on an agenda to be voted on by the Commission.  Upon an approval by the entire Commission, the order will come out which will order the company to do whatever it entails.  So we have to wait for that draft order to become an item on an agenda.   

Overall this is a step in the right direction to help our Spring Creek community deal with the water issues we have been facing for years. This is only one small step in a large process to fix the problem once and for all. 


The water meter reading consumer session happened on April 19th. You can read the Elko  Daily article here. If you would like to make comments or read the water companies testimony you can also find that below.

If you would like to make comments in the docket, the information is below as well as if you want to file comments with the BCP as part of testimony. From here, the water company made their testimony as noted in the links below. The PUCN staff will now make their testimony and it will go in front of the commission in a pre-conference hearing in June. We will know what way the commission would like to go from here: 

Click water and wastewater on the left and click on docket 16-12006. 

Please mail all comments to:

Public Utilities Commission of Nevada

1150 E. William Street

Carson City, NV  89701

The comments must have the Docket number, address and signature of the person filing the comments in order for the comments to be included in the record of the Docket.  Since they are available for public view, advise not to include account numbers or anything else they don’t want public to see. 

You may also electronically file comments in the Docket by going to the PUCN website http://puc.nv.gov – Under Filing & Fees – Electronic Filing and Payment System.  If you have problems filing your comments this way, please contact the PUCN’s Business Process Services at 775-684-6198.                                      

Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection Hotline:  702-486-3132

The Hotline is updated on a regular basis.  Have a pen or pencil handy and make the appropriate selection when prompted. 

Email:  aginfo@ag.nv.gov


Water Meter Reading Community Meeting Update: We recently connected with the PUCN regarding next steps for a community meeting to address issues with Great Basin Water Company. They will be scheduling this meeting in the next few weeks which will include PUCN reps. This is good news! Once we know the date and where, we will inform the residents.


An update regarding the water meter reading issue! Good job for speaking up and letting your voice be heard!

Yesterday, the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada Commissioners reviewed the water meter reading issue as the Commission meeting. General Counsel’s memo was approved and the issue will be set for further proceedings so the Commission can dive deeper into this issue. No late fees, the company must defer from collecting any of the amounts in dispute. General Counsel also proposed that the company notify all customers, not in a bill stuffer but actually notify, that this proceedings is happening. –that was included in the memo and approved by the Commission.

The Chairman expressed great concern about Nevadans being affected by these high bills. He said he realizes this eats into people’s family budget. He was very concerned that the public interest is protected and wants to get to the facts to ensure there is resolution for our Association members and make sure this does not happen again.

I would direct everyone to get on the service list for the docket # 16-12006. You will be notified on anything gets filed into it.

You can listen to the Commission meeting by clicking this link: http://pucweb1.state.nv.us/puc2/CommissionInfo.aspx . Then select ‘view’ next to ‘audio recording of agenda meeting’. It should come up on windows media player and you’ll be able to skip over beginning parts. You can listen to this agenda item at about 1 Hour and 12 Minutes.

It is encouraging to know that the Bureau of Consumer Protection, the PUCN regulatory staff and the Commission are taking this serious and listening to the property owner voices.

Agenda Item: http://pucweb1.state.nv.us/…/AXImages/Agendas/02-17/6833.pdf ; Item 5B

Nuisance Issues - ATV, Dogs Running Loose or Barking

Keep informed on what is happening in our HOA by click the links below. From water issues, road maintenance, programs and events, you can find it in these monthly updates!

Spring Creek Association Business License: 

The COA has enacted a business license to help the SCA manage the business environment in Spring Creek including the impacts these businesses generate on roads and other areas. The fee schedule is quite similar to the City of Elko’s if you review it. The COA secretary made an error when publishing the first version which has caused quite a stir. She is certainly upset about this and we do apologize. She has since updated with the correct chart and posted this as well. Spring Creek is not a small HOA, it is one of the largest HOA’s in the Country and is starting to rival the City of Elko’s population who has many of these permits and management tools. The DOR’s require that all lots are accessed the same in the Association regardless of zoning. In order to equalize the impact that businesses have in Spring Creek, this license will help level this field. It will also, as stated above, be a management tool when there are issues. As you know, we are looking at the options of being something other than the HOA since managing all of these areas has become quite a large task. We have been asked to clarify, which is great feedback for us if it did not appear clear, what is considered home and what would be considered commercial. We use the same standards as the City of Elko does on this as well so in general Home Based is anything operated out of your home and commercial is anything on a commercial or industrial zoned parcel and or has a storefront or office.

Please review the website for the updated information.

Regarding the Elko Daily Article on Business Licenses:

As noted in the paper, there was discussion at the County regarding the issues we are seeing in Spring Creek with soliciting.  The goal of updating our County with this issue (of which we update them monthly on what is happening in the SCA) is to brainstorm how we can work together on finding a solution for the specific soliciting issue since the Sheriff’s office is our law enforcement. After speaking with the Sheriff, he is having a hard time enforcing this rule since it is just an HOA rule. We do have an HOA rule regarding No Soliciting which many outside companies seem to ignore. Outside companies are the ones we would like to try and target and put a strategy in place to limit them from continued soliciting. We do not want or intend to punish those companies or business who are doing what they are supposed to do and this is why we would like to look at a targeted approach to the issue. I would highly doubt the County would want to have a business permit as was stated in the meeting although I do think there would be much support for targeting these solicitors who come from the outside and are an issue. There is research happening behind the scenes on what could be put in place to help with this issue. Another suggestion was to put in an ordinance that references these temp and outside solicitors that could say no soliciting specific to the SCA similar to the rule with the County regarding no ATV’s on roads in the SCA. There have been no decisions and only simply exploring what options could be, this is the very start of these conversations. We also would not want to add more regulations, paperwork and headache so would hope to target the issue as much as possible. More to come on this in the upcoming weeks.

As a final note, all COA and Board meetings follow open meeting law which means agendas are posted in accordance to these rules and the meetings are open to the public. We encourage people to come to the meetings to keep up to date on issues and provide feedback to the volunteers helping run the SCA.

We have become aware that there are many frustrations from homeowners regarding Frontier Communications. We have contacted the Public Utilities Commission to ask for guidance and how we can help our residents get answers. They do not regulate the internet but will make sure it gets to the correct avenues as they have escalator groups to work with the companies and address the issues. Use the information and format below to document your issues and complaint:

Your Name:
Your Address:
Your Phone Number:

Email it to: cjones@puc.nv.gov
OR Call 775-684-6119

 You can also contact the FCC and Bureau of Consumer Affairs to place a complaint:

FCC - https://consumercomplaints.fcc.gov/hc/en-us

Bureau of Consumer Affairs - http://ag.nv.gov/About/Consumer_Protection/Bureau_of_Consumer_Protection/

Water Bill - AB 109

Having a nuisance issue? Dogs barking or loose? ATV issues? Here is the procedure so we can help.

Here is how you can report an issue so we can address the property owner right away as nuisance violation.

The information below is what we request you supply us. You can make a complaint several ways including calling 775-753-6295, email: jessiebahr@springcreeknv.org, or anonymous contact by using our online contact form here: 


We ask you provide as much information as possible in the case as noted below.

Date of complaint
Address where issue is occurring
Issue in detail including the following:

If nuisance regards an animal complaint:

i.Description of animal

Size (Sm, Med, Large)

ii.What type of nuisance is it?

Running at large

iii.Specific dates and times of occurrences

iv.Video, audio or photo documentation is helpful

If nuisance regards a noise nuisance in another form (music, revving car engines, etc.):

i.Specific dates and times of occurrences

ii.Video, audio or photo documentation is helpful

If nuisance regards an ATV or OHV issue:

i.Specific dates and times of occurrences

ii.Video, audio or photo documentation is helpful

All complaints remain anonymous, but if the issue persists and a hearing is required, then the complainant will be notified of the hearing and asked to attend to state their issues. They are not required to attend, however; their written, photo or audio/video evidence to support the complaint will be submitted to the COA for the hearing.

Soliciting & Business Licenses

What's Happening In The HOA?

As introduced AB 109 did two things:  Required the staff of the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada to travel to Elko at least once a year and conduct a consumer session.  Second, it required the Bureau of Consumer Protection in the Attorney General’s office to intervene in all Spring Creek rate cases.  In the Assembly Commerce and Labor Committee testimony by rate payers, the Chairman of the PUCN, Joe Reynolds and Eric Witkowski, and the Administration of BCP was well received.  BCP did submit a fiscal note for $40,000 which Mr. Witkowskii told the committee was added because the Governor’s budget had cut some of his funding for travel and hiring expert witnesses.  Mr. Witkowski also assured the committee that his office had sufficient reserves to cover anticipated costs associated with any Spring Creek rate cases.   There was no opposition to the bill.  The bill was voted out of committee and sent to the Assembly floor for approval.  During the floor testimony Assemblywoman Maggie Carlton moved the bill be referred to her committee on Ways and Means. 

The bill was finally heard in Ways on May 1st with no concerns expressed by the committee members except Chair Carlton who repeated the same questions she asked in the commerce and labor committee of both PUCN and BCP and received the same answers.  AB 109 has no fiscal impact on the state general fund or either of the two agencies.  Despite all the repeated efforts of Assemblyman Ellison, Senator Goicoechea and myself, Chairwoman Carlton would not allow the bill forward into a work session (which is the final hearing on a bill before it is moved out of committee).

After repeated pleas to Speaker Frierson, Majority Leader Teresa Benitez Thompson and Senate Majority Floor Leader Ford to process the bill word was received that the BCP fiscal note was still a problem.  Within a few hours Senator Goicoechea and Assemblyman Ellison had the fiscal note officially withdrawn by the Attorney General’s office.  Remember that during all previous hearing all legislators including Carlton were satisfied there was not a fiscal impact on the 2017-2019 State Budget.  I remain convinced that the fiscal note was a smoke screen for Carlton not to process the bill ever.  Because of the efforts of Ellison and Goicoechea, Republican leadership in both the Senate and Assembly made AB 109 a top priority.  Despite daily and sometimes twice daily contacts with democrat leadership the bill was not moving. 

Sunday afternoon, I met in person with Assembly Majority Leader Teresa Benetiz-Thompson and asked point blank why 109 had not moved.  She told me democrat leadership will not process the bill under any circumstances.  I pressed the issue as to why and was told because rural republicans would not support tax increases.  Then she told me it was because of the fiscal note which I quickly reminded her was withdrawn.  Then she said it was that the BCP would have to use reserves.   Monday night at midnight the 79th legislative session ended, AB 109 was not processed and it died.

You asked about next steps:  While I cannot speak for Senator Goicoechea or Assemblyman Ellison the consensus among all three of us is that both PUCN and BCP will voluntarily carryout the terms of the bill.  I would suggest you contact PUCN ask if they are still willing to come to Spring Creek voluntarily at least once a year for a consumer session.  Also contact BCP and ask upon your request that BCP intervene in SCA rate cases. 

For our part Capitol Partners is available to continue to represent the SCA on an as needed basis on a rate we can negotiate.  I want to assure you that we left no stone unturned in our efforts to win passage of AB 109 and as I indicated on several occasions we remained optimistic until last Sunday when Benitez-Thompson told me in person that the democrat leadership would not process the bill.

​Canada geese are a valuable natural resource and a source of recreation to the general public, bird watchers, and hunters. Of all the waterfowl, geese are particularly opportunistic and can easily become accustomed to people. In many areas of the United States, resident Canada goose populations have increased dramatically since the 1960's. Flocks of non-migrating Canada geese have become established throughout many states. In urban areas, Canada geese have responded to landscape features that provide expanses of short grass for food, lack of natural predators, absence of hunting, and hand feeding by some people.

Although most people find a few geese acceptable, problems develop as local flocks grow and the droppings become excessive (a goose produces a pound of droppings per day). Problems include over-grazed lawns, accumulations of droppings and feathers on play areas and walkways, nutrient loading in the marina, public health concerns at the beach, aggressive behavior by nesting birds, and safety hazards near our roads. 

Damage Prevention and Control Methods

Types of Control Methods

There are many ways to discourage Canada geese from settling. No single technique is universally effective and socially acceptable. Persistent application of a combination of methods is usually necessary and yields the best results.

Goose problems in suburban areas are especially difficult because birds are not afraid of people and may become accustomed to scaring techniques. But don't rule out any technique that might be feasible; dogs under strict supervision can safely be used and controlled hunting has been successfully used at some golf courses. Once geese settle in a particular location, they will be more tolerant of disturbances and be difficult to disperse. No method works well with just a few attempts, and a comprehensive, long-term strategy is usually needed.

Control measures work in various ways. Some reduce the biological carrying capacity of an area to support geese by reducing food or habitat. Other methods disperse geese to other sites where, hopefully, they are of less concern. Some techniques reduce the actual number of geese to a level that people can tolerate ("social carrying capacity").

To effectively reduce goose damage, the Association, with the guidance of a wildlife biologist and other experts, needs to use as many methods as possible.

The geese management plan is almost complete for 2017. We will look for planning for the 2018 year.

Interested in helping on goose patrol with dogs or drones?

Please contact the SCA through the Contact tab at the top.

Water Meter Reading Issue